Computing results...
Five people from the list below will become the members of the Community Committee (CC). Assign weights to each person according to how much you want them to be in the committee (higher weight = higher preference). The system will assume you want to maximize the sum of weights of selected candidates.
If you want to keep things simple and just rank people individually, give them weights that are successive powers of two. I.e. your least favored candidate gets 1, then 2, 4, 8, 16, and the most favored gets 32. If you do that, feel free to ignore the text below.
The apparent winner of this poll was the set of choices ( 1,2,3,4,5 ):
|
There are 21 possible sets of 5 choices that can be formed by selecting from the 7 choices. Of these, 6 sets were considered thoroughly, comparing against the 11 nearby (similar) sets that differ in just one choice.
This is the voting preference matrix, reporting maximal valid proportional preferences. Fractional digits indicate nonproportional preferences, which help break ties in proportional preference.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. (1,2,3,4,5) | - | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 14.2 | 21.21 | |
2. (1,2,3,4,6) | 0.04 | - | 0.15 | 0.19 | 17.18 | 18.2 | |
3. (1,2,3,5,6) | 0.04 | 0.05 | - | 0.11 | 13.16 | 16.16 | |
4. (1,2,4,5,6) | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | - | 17.17 | 14.14 | |
5. (1,3,4,5,6) | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.11 | - | 7.12 | |
6. (2,3,4,5,6) | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 | - |
You can compare any two sets of choices. Just enter the numbers of the choices (from 1 to 7) in each set, with the numbers of one set's choices in the left column and the numbers of the other's in the right column.
The following gives the details of how the poll would have resulted if run on single choices, without proportional representation. This hypothetical poll defines the “individual preference order” used above.
Winning choices are shown in bold.
The 1. place goes to candidate E: compn The 2. place goes to candidate A: Vittorio Giovara The 3. place goes to candidate G: Rémi Denis-Courmont The 4. place goes to candidate D: Anton Khirnov The 5. place goes to candidate B: James Almer The 6. place goes to candidate F: Jean-Baptiste Kempf The 7. place goes to candidate C: Marth64
For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.
Vittorio Giovara | James Almer | Marth64 | Anton Khirnov | compn | Jean-Baptiste Kempf | Rémi Denis-Courmont | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
: | 0 | 111 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 69 | 1 |
45846959492439598685809: | 32 | 4 | 16 | 64 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
: | 0 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
78: | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
: | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
: | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
: | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
: | 24 | 8 | 20 | 32 | 1 | 8 | 16 |
: | 3 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
: | 0 | 100 | 300 | 2 | 999 | 2 | 1 |
: | 16 | 32 | 16 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 32 |
162988: | 5 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
: | 10 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 200 | 70 |
753159: | 0 | 654 | 876 | 0 | 543 | 432 | 210 |
: | 0 | 32 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
: | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
: | 3 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
: | 0 | 444 | 99 | 0 | 999 | 0 | 0 |
: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8008137: | 4 | 1 | 16 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
: | 12 | 20 | 18 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 15 |
2389962: | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
: | 10 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 10 |
200: | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
: | 32 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
62232: | 4 | 2 | 8 | 64 | 1 | 32 | 16 |
: | 0 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
: | 1 | 16 | 32 | 2 | 64 | 8 | 4 |
9554: | 50 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 90 |
: | 0 | 999 | 999 | 0 | 999 | 0 | 0 |
: | 1 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
Ballots are shown in a randomly generated order.
[Download ballots in CSV format]
[Download ballots in DAT format]
Candidates in original order:A: Vittorio Giovara B: James Almer C: Marth64 D: Anton Khirnov E: compn F: Jean-Baptiste Kempf G: Rémi Denis-Courmont
A 0.000000 22.448276 24.800000 25.363636 14.307692 24.541667 23.705882 B 8.551724 0.000000 15.500000 9.434783 8.346154 12.130435 8.037037 C 6.200000 15.500000 0.000000 13.285714 8.346154 12.178571 9.538462 D 5.636364 21.565217 17.714286 0.000000 14.965517 17.947368 7.750000 E 16.692308 22.653846 22.653846 16.034483 0.000000 19.518519 17.222222 F 6.458333 18.869565 18.821429 13.052632 11.481481 0.000000 4.227273 G 7.294118 22.962963 21.461538 23.250000 13.777778 26.772727 0.000000 The 1. place goes to candidate E. A 0.000000 14.431034 14.946429 13.216301 14.322158 13.980392 B 8.551724 0.000000 13.777778 8.179910 10.502887 8.037037 C 6.200000 12.055556 0.000000 8.017241 10.293742 9.164683 D 5.636364 14.802849 14.965517 0.000000 13.840290 7.750000 F 6.458333 14.221889 14.287135 9.142468 0.000000 4.227273 G 7.294118 14.431034 14.392857 11.892241 14.673981 0.000000 The 2. place goes to candidate A. B 0.000000 10.333333 8.179910 9.904427 8.037037 C 9.620690 0.000000 8.017241 9.904427 9.164683 D 9.868566 9.977011 0.000000 9.737088 7.750000 F 9.620690 9.964286 8.867879 0.000000 4.227273 G 9.620690 9.964286 9.240777 9.798851 0.000000 The 3. place goes to candidate G. B 0.000000 7.750000 7.011917 7.616379 C 7.215517 0.000000 6.930583 7.616379 D 7.401424 7.482759 0.000000 7.349138 F 7.215517 7.473214 6.930583 0.000000 The 4. place goes to candidate D. B 0.000000 6.200000 6.093103 C 5.921139 0.000000 6.093103 F 5.921139 5.986207 0.000000 The 5. place goes to candidate B. C 0.000000 5.077586 F 5.166667 0.000000 The 6. place goes to candidate F. The 7. place goes to candidate C.